Defeating The Marxist Agenda with Collective Intelligence.

The fight over the female Olympic boxer Imane Khelif is a fight over word definitions.

Can you define the following terms?

Far left.

Far right.

Illegal immigrant.

Woman.

Racist.

Vaccine.

Fake news.

Legal immigrant.

Hate Speech.

Violence.

Riot.

Insurrection.

Homophobic.

Assault rifle.

Antisemitic.

Domestic terrorist.

Corruption.

Political bribery.

---

The Marxists playbook looks like this: They split up people by labels into groups of the oppressors and the oppressed, and then they blur hot button cultural and political definitions with their influence over media in order to stoke the flames.

“Women” is a protected category in sports as we all know from this week’s fiasco in female boxing at the Paris Olympics. But you cannot protect something you cannot define, so that definition is purposely blurred in order to sow division.

The horrible people in power are purposely defining these words in loose fashion, and then using those words over and over again like a mantra. It is a technique, like jiu jitsu, used by propagandists on crowds to keep them fighting. Assign labels to get the people to divide, and then blur the meaning of words for crucial sensitive topics, all while calling each other names along those dividing lines.

If we clearly defined the words we listed above, it would change a lot. We could have real conversations with each other. The word meanings are at the root of the culture war. Definitions matter. We must define these terms clearly. It is not acceptable to have a policy, rule, law, or protected category and not be able to have a clear standard definition for what everyone is talking about. This is why good contracts always have clear definitions in them. Our social contracts need to as well.

The word “vaccine” is another example of this. Vaccine companies cannot be sued because of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986. If these companies can blur the definition of vaccines, and call anything they want to a vaccine, this makes it hard to hold them accountable.

Another good example is the word “immigration.” If we cannot define what illegal immigration is, then how can we begin to implement a fair, standard, and humane policy around it?

You see this same technique being used for writing corporate sponsored laws and bills. For the Patriot Act (what’s a terrorist?) words were loosely defined to give broad interpretations to the government to do as they please. Same thing with the powers of the TSA and NSA. Or, the proposed Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). What’s harmful material? What is inappropriate for kids? What is considered a “dark patterns” that they want to prohibit?

Definitions should be where humanity starts our discussions. We should not allow corporate media or our broken education systems to loosely define these important words for society. The solution is we define them ourselves. We could and should use modern collective intelligence systems to define each important term clearly. This way we could unify and pushback on everyone who misuses terms in order to purposely sow divide. Until we decide to do that, people who wish us ill will keep trying to use our own language to divide us.

In terms of the Olympics, defining what constitutes the protected division - the women’s division in this case - is the solution to the issue. This is not an issue about trans people at the core. It is an issue about what it means to be part of the protected divisions in sports.

For the boxing issue we ask these 3 simple questions that if we answered we could solve the problem:

1) Should there be a protected women's division at all?

2) If yes, then why?

3) What defines the parameters to be in that division?

To us, the answer is 1) yes there should be, and 2) because of safety and fairness. But the third question is the one no one that needs clarification by the organizations.

No one cares when an athlete plays up. For example when a woman plays up in the men's division. We only care when it is reversed, and they play down. Just like we would not care if a 16 year old jiu jitsu student competed in the adult division by choice. But we certainly would care if an adult went into the kids’ divisions. The kids’ divisions are clearly defined with clear parameters for age. Weight classes are clearly defined as well. We need to do the same for the women’s division. Tell us the clear parameters - all of the specifics - needed to define what is and what is not allowed to be protected in the women's division, and why. Let's clarify that, then we can begin to debate the rest.

Cloudy definitions cause tears in society. Most of our division as humanity today is a result of blurred definitions, and labels. Make no mistake, this is being done on purpose by well paid propaganda strategists. We must as humans take ownership for our language, clearly define the boundaries of our society, and redefine the words the people in power are using to have us fight over.

Thanks for Reading!

---

Solving problems is happiness.
And humans solve problems better in high-trust groups.
#CollectiveIntelligence

Please join our think tank message board at SwarmAcademy.ai where we continue conversations like this one and where you will be able to participate in swarm intelligence problem solving with us (once it is built). NOTE: We are building it now.

For over 3 billion years on this planet there were only single-celled organisms. Then one day they somehow learned to work together and make complex multi-celled creatures . Right now we are like those single-celled organisms. Our next evolution is finding how to work together, better… (like we wrote about here).

#SwarmAcademy #LEADERLESS #ResultsMatterMost #DecentralizeEverything #DemandTransparency

COMMENTS ARE FOR EVERYONE AS A PLACE TO THINK-TANK SOLUTIONS. They will never be for paid-only subscribers and we will never charge a subscription.