Voting Doesn't Solve Problems. It Just Divides Our Solutions Into Two Possible Bad Choices.
If a system does not allow for competing theories to arise, it is a bad system. Collective intelligence is the answer.
If a system does not allow for competing theories to arise, it is a bad system.
If you look at any metric it is clear that our systems are failing us. Our systems used to allow for spirited debate in Congress and the Universities but those systems have become fully corrupted. Competing theories are now silenced. Our sub-systems (the Democrats and Republicans) offer up one solution each, and therefore do not allow for additional competing theories to arise. This is made possible because these are centralized and TOP DOWN systems, and thus easy to corrupt.
The solution of course is to reverse this simple flow of problem solving. Bottom up solutions cannot be corrupted as easily especially with well designed systems like we mention HERE, HERE, or HERE.
It is time to reverse this flow using collective intelligence systems.
We can fix the entire government and world, like THIS.
Thanks for reading!
Solving problems is happiness.
And humans solve problems better in high-trust groups.
#CollectiveIntelligence
Please join our think tank message board at SwarmAcademy.ai where we continue conversations like this one and where you will be able to participate in swarm intelligence problem solving with us (once it is built). NOTE: We are building it now.
For over 3 billion years on this planet there were only single-celled organisms. Then one day they somehow learned to work together and make complex multi-celled creatures . Right now we are like those single-celled organisms. Our next evolution is finding how to work together, better… (like we wrote about here).
#SwarmAcademy #LEADERLESS #ResultsMatterMost #DecentralizeEverything #DemandTransparency
COMMENTS ARE FOR EVERYONE AS A PLACE TO THINK-TANK SOLUTIONS. They will never be for paid-only subscribers and we will never charge a subscription.
All we have been doing is voting for more government slavery by trying to choose the least whip-happy master. You are never voting for freedom. Government was invented to control the citizen, not give the citizen a voice.
Well said. "Problem solvers" indeed.
We have been conned. Dictated by the City of London and proselytised by the investment banker alliance through gullible academics and journalists, we have been indoctrinated to believe democracy consists of electing strangers to determine our future for us. As Acton observed, this places cumulative power in the hands of the elected, and power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. It is only a matter of time before the Elected becomes the Ruler and, very quickly, the Dictator. This has happened globally, right now.
So what is democracy? Thomas Paine spelled it out in 'The Rights of Man', but the key is "The People are the source of all authority". Abraham Lincoln studied the words of Paine and observing the banker-driven distortions of the word 'representative', created his lyrical cameo "Government of the people, by the people and for the people". Contemporarily, with the tyranny of distance no longer requiring a representative to convey our will to the administration, every citizen can outline or detail his wishes to whatever extent he wishes and convey this to the administration for installation. Excluded as extraneous are politicians, parliaments, voting, elections and glorious edifaces that are in fact proxy palaces.
In practice, referenda (CIR) can be drafted in three or more alternative formats, one enabling priority check boxes for budget investment or alocation, a second providing several options per folio, and a third permitting the citizen to submit his values on all portfolios, in book form if he so wishes. A mathematical fact is that there is more knowledge, wisdom and expoerience outside of conventional government than within it; and laws of economics illuminate the reality that referenda enables the administration to benefit from every single item of knowledge and skill in the nation, whereas politicians are an obstacle to the knowledge/wisdom pool.
The globalists have miscalculated. Incrementally, they are replacing politicians with oligarchs, but oligarchs can much more easily be cut down, and by fewer people. Citizens who are awake despair at the low percentage who see reality but they may feel more optimistic if hey realise that the percentage of citizens who participated in the American Revolution was a mere 3%. Today, we need less. And, because the globalists are psychoipaths, our collective intelligence is better balaanced and, moreover, we can trust each other, but the globalists cannot. Each one secretly wants to rule the world. They are their own chicane; their own abyss. And I know how to walk them to the edge.