Discussion about this post

User's avatar
173dVietVet's avatar

I see a "problem...." with Eve.

How does vouching for each other prevent intelligence or police informants from infiltrating the "community" to then create issues trying to draw community members into saying or agreeing to something that will later be used to prosecute them ?? We all have experienced situations where in heat of moment a friend or family member says something we know is not intended to be carried out, but an outsider might see it differently.

How often have we heard our buddy/relative say something like, "That guy needs to be horsewhipped" or similar "Kill the lot of them..." ?? Next someone agrees and so the police are now informed, by virtue of their informant gathering "evidence" of a CONSPIRACY. It becomes even more insidious because the first comment was made by their informant to pimp the resulting over-the-top comment and create a conspiracy where none existed.

Eve groups would have to have very strict rules about comments which defeats the purpose of the Eve platform.

I do not see this as a valid aid in bringing cohesion to a group, but your mileage may differ.

Expand full comment
Marnie Khaw's avatar

This is exactly the kind of infrastructure we need—decentralized, resilient, and designed for real trust, not control. Eve doesn’t eliminate risk through surveillance; it distributes responsibility through social incentives and mutual accountability. That’s a fundamentally stronger model.

Count me in—I’m excited to follow and support this as it evolves.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts