I think this is a great idea (better than the one I had of just putting their name and criminal activity on a website!) but how can this be done? If anyone so much as slips up and gets tracked to the real person they will suffer dire consequences such as having their bank account suddenly disappeared! The corruption is to deep at this point. There are numerous bills in the works against encrypted communications that will certainly be enacted and we will not be able to stop that either since they do what they want no matter the protest against it. Maybe if we start slowly building into a full blown platform (using Rumble? I don't think Substack has the means but..) the first foot in gets the wettest!
In truth, we can all collect our own data, privately, encrypted, and share it selectively with whom we wish. For those seeking positions of power that people in the public might consider "levers worth compromising", requests could be made to make a politician's personal data transparent to some appropriate degree.
If the cryptocurrency age has a benefit beyond the winner of the "store of value" race, it might be in the reversal of "big data as asymmetric power". Large amounts of data can possibly be made into symmetric utility.
It surely could be done on an app, open source; people can contribute things they randomly find; some kind of AI to check the added items are legit and essentially a database built up on any public servant or influential figure that has significant power in our society. Must be easy enough with the tech we have currently.
How would this work without Digital ID? Is this just another way to get support for or trick people to sign up for their own personal digital shackles?
The only way this could work is if constituents do not rate the politicians (that should happen privately on election day). Relevent information and data points can be submitted and a DAO (decentralised autonomous organisation) rating agency can enter the details into the score calculator. All data points, all calculations should be public. Anyone (whether a constituent or not) should be free to submit relevent data points or raise concerns with any of the data that is being used in the calculations. People should be free to discuss whether some factors should be weighted more or less heavily than others. Keep it fully open source and fully transparent but do not log users or require registration or verification (only the data points should require verification).
OOH make it a freedom score...wait a minute they already have it...conservative vote rankings.
I say let's create a website, put all the social credit scores on the internet and beat them to the punch?
Can you do it please?
I think this is a great idea (better than the one I had of just putting their name and criminal activity on a website!) but how can this be done? If anyone so much as slips up and gets tracked to the real person they will suffer dire consequences such as having their bank account suddenly disappeared! The corruption is to deep at this point. There are numerous bills in the works against encrypted communications that will certainly be enacted and we will not be able to stop that either since they do what they want no matter the protest against it. Maybe if we start slowly building into a full blown platform (using Rumble? I don't think Substack has the means but..) the first foot in gets the wettest!
💯 BRILLIANT IDEA 💡
In truth, we can all collect our own data, privately, encrypted, and share it selectively with whom we wish. For those seeking positions of power that people in the public might consider "levers worth compromising", requests could be made to make a politician's personal data transparent to some appropriate degree.
If the cryptocurrency age has a benefit beyond the winner of the "store of value" race, it might be in the reversal of "big data as asymmetric power". Large amounts of data can possibly be made into symmetric utility.
This is a great idea, if there is someone who can handle the logistics
It surely could be done on an app, open source; people can contribute things they randomly find; some kind of AI to check the added items are legit and essentially a database built up on any public servant or influential figure that has significant power in our society. Must be easy enough with the tech we have currently.
I am certainly willing to contribute research to the cause! I do not do websites so that is not an option.
How would this work without Digital ID? Is this just another way to get support for or trick people to sign up for their own personal digital shackles?
The only way this could work is if constituents do not rate the politicians (that should happen privately on election day). Relevent information and data points can be submitted and a DAO (decentralised autonomous organisation) rating agency can enter the details into the score calculator. All data points, all calculations should be public. Anyone (whether a constituent or not) should be free to submit relevent data points or raise concerns with any of the data that is being used in the calculations. People should be free to discuss whether some factors should be weighted more or less heavily than others. Keep it fully open source and fully transparent but do not log users or require registration or verification (only the data points should require verification).
This is who social credit is as made for ❤️❤️❤️
You had me at the headline.