Trump isn’t in control anymore than Biden was. It is just less apparent because he is a way better actor. Do you really think choosing sides of the two sides that both protect Jeffery Epstein matters?
Well done and completely true. What we see happening now was worked out nearly 20 years ago with precision. And what we saw 20 years ago, worked out 50 years before that.
If I were to add, which I may have just missed is this… “play your own game”. Even orienting to intelligent collective strategy that revolves around them losing will fail. They have worked through this already.
We need a large vision. Bigger than theirs. More interesting than theirs. More full of intrigue, mystery. You name it
It needs to create a bigger sink in spacetime. It can’t be liberation, revolution, it needs to be completely attractive without ties to the past.
My best contribution is this “heaven on earth where people roam free from all boarders, live for hundreds of years, where the forests are both gardens and mystery and the sea comes alive with beauty. Where stars fill the night sky and shimmer prophecy. Where mountains speak…”
Yessir, focus on solutions. One quick look back was an expose on how new members of the Texas House are formally oriented into "how things work around here." Utter BS. Looking forward, we need the rough and tumble of smart and honest individuals with character and virtue interested in best outcomes for the most people, not conformity to old patterns controlled by the sold-out few.
The problem with online groups is that every single online group that forms any challenge to dominant rule is infiltrated. Perhaps your idea of swarms is meant to circumvent… but can it really?
Of course they're all in on it. The planning has been out in the open since the nineteen-eighties and the Koch's et. al. funding machine began spending trillions of dollars to buy every elected official from dogcatcher to, oops, President.
The founders SPECIFICALLY warned against that, and Wilson slipped it in like a treasonous snake. Merry Christmas, America. I hope people smarter than I am have cynical eyes on what's looking like a shakeup at the fed. Could be a very good thing. Considering they're all in on it, I doubt it.
We’re in agreement that high-trust systems are important and that concentrated power definitely corrodes them (it’s a big club, and we ain’t in it). What I’ve been trying to get at in past exchanges and am really interested in hearing is your take is on the asymmetry problem. In mutualist terms, trust holds when everyone’s risk and reward stay proportional. Once some actors can externalize costs or shield themselves from consequences (think those at the top of Boeing redirecting blame at pilots and lower-level employees, discouraging workers bringing up safety issues, prioritizing bonuses over trust//quality/safety, etc), the trust becomes one-sided and capture is inevitable.
So I’d love to hear if you’ve thought about whether or not your model would keep that symmetry intact, especially when participants have very different leverage or technical capacity, and if so, if you have a solution for that. Thanks in advance!
They are all in on it...except for the 7 billion people they want to murder.
Exactly. ⚔️❤️
Or, just don't mind killing them. The millions who elected He Who Shall Not Be Named to the most powerful position in Earth bear some responsibility.
Trump isn’t in control anymore than Biden was. It is just less apparent because he is a way better actor. Do you really think choosing sides of the two sides that both protect Jeffery Epstein matters?
Well done and completely true. What we see happening now was worked out nearly 20 years ago with precision. And what we saw 20 years ago, worked out 50 years before that.
If I were to add, which I may have just missed is this… “play your own game”. Even orienting to intelligent collective strategy that revolves around them losing will fail. They have worked through this already.
We need a large vision. Bigger than theirs. More interesting than theirs. More full of intrigue, mystery. You name it
It needs to create a bigger sink in spacetime. It can’t be liberation, revolution, it needs to be completely attractive without ties to the past.
My best contribution is this “heaven on earth where people roam free from all boarders, live for hundreds of years, where the forests are both gardens and mystery and the sea comes alive with beauty. Where stars fill the night sky and shimmer prophecy. Where mountains speak…”
We need a new myth.
EVERY SINGLE POLITICIAN FOR 100 YEARS HAS BEEN DEEP STATE NWO SATANIC PLANET
Yessir, focus on solutions. One quick look back was an expose on how new members of the Texas House are formally oriented into "how things work around here." Utter BS. Looking forward, we need the rough and tumble of smart and honest individuals with character and virtue interested in best outcomes for the most people, not conformity to old patterns controlled by the sold-out few.
We know.
They've been five steps ahead of us for 100 years.
Any meaningful disruption is met with life ending responses.
We know we're together in wanting to resist this bullsh*t.
I'm just saying... We know. We're here. We agree. What do we do that has a snowball's chance without throwing away what's left of our lives?
We form into decentralized swarms. Do you read our substack? We have a new easier plan coming out soon, but this covers the general idea
https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/how-to-fix-corrupt-government-in?r=7oa9d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Concise and clear. Shared your article as a story on my IG. Thx for your precise articulation without a lot of extra fluff. 🙏🙌
Know your enemy.
Most of them are silver spoon fed, idiots that are trying to fulfill grandfathers demented dreams of dominance.
Transparency!! The best way to get 7 billion people to understand the real issue
That's our next article!
Your discord invite is not valid
Weird. Updated: https://discord.gg/cdRsEYqm
The problem with online groups is that every single online group that forms any challenge to dominant rule is infiltrated. Perhaps your idea of swarms is meant to circumvent… but can it really?
The GREATEST crime against humanity EVER. 100 years of satanic indoctrination into the NWO PRISON PLANET. ALL. POLITICIANS NWO. GLOBALLY
Of course they're all in on it. The planning has been out in the open since the nineteen-eighties and the Koch's et. al. funding machine began spending trillions of dollars to buy every elected official from dogcatcher to, oops, President.
With due respect Carleton, I believe this nonsense was happening WAY before the 1980’s. WAY BEFORE…
At least since JFK, but even well before that. JFK was the big step.
Also, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, signed on December 23, 1913…aka: “the debt slavery act”😉
And look at our monetary system today-FUBAR!
The founders SPECIFICALLY warned against that, and Wilson slipped it in like a treasonous snake. Merry Christmas, America. I hope people smarter than I am have cynical eyes on what's looking like a shakeup at the fed. Could be a very good thing. Considering they're all in on it, I doubt it.
I see old coinage from pre-1933, and I marvel how beautiful the sound money WAS.
I still pick up pennies off the ground-Pennie’s from heaven (my mom)-lol!
We’re in agreement that high-trust systems are important and that concentrated power definitely corrodes them (it’s a big club, and we ain’t in it). What I’ve been trying to get at in past exchanges and am really interested in hearing is your take is on the asymmetry problem. In mutualist terms, trust holds when everyone’s risk and reward stay proportional. Once some actors can externalize costs or shield themselves from consequences (think those at the top of Boeing redirecting blame at pilots and lower-level employees, discouraging workers bringing up safety issues, prioritizing bonuses over trust//quality/safety, etc), the trust becomes one-sided and capture is inevitable.
So I’d love to hear if you’ve thought about whether or not your model would keep that symmetry intact, especially when participants have very different leverage or technical capacity, and if so, if you have a solution for that. Thanks in advance!
It’s all out in the open for the shameless purpose of normalizing it.
The first link does not work.
You're just smokescreening if ypu don't reveal the 100 year fraud.
Got a link? Not sure what you are referring to